complete practical part
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,18 +1,15 @@
|
||||
package dev.banking.model;
|
||||
|
||||
import java.util.concurrent.locks.Lock;
|
||||
import java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantReadWriteLock;
|
||||
|
||||
public class BankAccount {
|
||||
|
||||
private final int accountId;
|
||||
private long balance;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Students may introduce additional fields
|
||||
* such as:
|
||||
* - Lock / ReentrantLock
|
||||
* - ReadWriteLock
|
||||
* - Object monitor
|
||||
* - etc.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
private final ReentrantReadWriteLock rwLock = new ReentrantReadWriteLock();
|
||||
private final Lock readLock = rwLock.readLock();
|
||||
private final Lock writeLock = rwLock.writeLock();
|
||||
|
||||
public BankAccount(int accountId, long initialBalance) {
|
||||
this.accountId = accountId;
|
||||
@@ -23,56 +20,71 @@ public class BankAccount {
|
||||
return accountId;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* TODO:
|
||||
* Return the current balance in a thread-safe way.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Requirements:
|
||||
* - Must be safe under concurrent reads/writes
|
||||
* - Should not block unnecessarily if using read/write locks
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public long getBalance() {
|
||||
throw new UnsupportedOperationException("TODO: implement thread-safe balance read");
|
||||
readLock.lock();
|
||||
try
|
||||
{
|
||||
return balance;
|
||||
} finally
|
||||
{
|
||||
readLock.unlock();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* TODO:
|
||||
* Increase balance atomically.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Requirements:
|
||||
* - Must not lose updates under concurrency
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public void deposit(long amount) {
|
||||
throw new UnsupportedOperationException("TODO: implement thread-safe deposit");
|
||||
writeLock.lock();
|
||||
try
|
||||
{
|
||||
balance += amount;
|
||||
} finally
|
||||
{
|
||||
writeLock.unlock();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* TODO:
|
||||
* Decrease balance atomically.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Requirements:
|
||||
* - Must not cause race conditions
|
||||
* - Negative balance handling is NOT required unless you decide
|
||||
* to extend the system (optional)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public void withdraw(long amount) {
|
||||
throw new UnsupportedOperationException("TODO: implement thread-safe withdraw");
|
||||
writeLock.lock();
|
||||
try
|
||||
{
|
||||
balance -= amount;
|
||||
} finally
|
||||
{
|
||||
writeLock.unlock();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* TODO:
|
||||
* Transfer money between two accounts atomically.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* IMPORTANT REQUIREMENTS:
|
||||
* - Must be atomic (no partial transfer)
|
||||
* - Must be deadlock-free
|
||||
* - Must protect both source and target accounts
|
||||
*
|
||||
* HINT:
|
||||
* - Consider global lock ordering using accountId
|
||||
* - Or tryLock with retry strategy
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public void transfer(BankAccount target, long amount) {
|
||||
throw new UnsupportedOperationException("TODO: implement atomic deadlock-free transfer");
|
||||
if (target == this)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
BankAccount first = this;
|
||||
BankAccount second = target;
|
||||
|
||||
if (this.getAccountId() > target.getAccountId())
|
||||
{
|
||||
first = target;
|
||||
second = this;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
first.writeLock.lock();
|
||||
try
|
||||
{
|
||||
second.writeLock.lock();
|
||||
try
|
||||
{
|
||||
//"first" and "second":only for the order of locking to prevent deadlock (have nothing to do with the direction of the transfer)
|
||||
this.balance -= amount;
|
||||
target.balance += amount;
|
||||
} finally
|
||||
{
|
||||
second.writeLock.unlock();
|
||||
}
|
||||
} finally
|
||||
{
|
||||
first.writeLock.unlock();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user